From the ground…

I have refused external PhD examining in UK – and refused to do reviewing submitted papers for journals. I have cut out the circle/UCU from the ‘I’m working to contract’ poster and stuck it on the rear car window. I’ll put the poster in the front window at home. I am refusing to go to meetings whenever possible.

(email footer reads: We ask University employers to negotiate, not impose, pension changes…)

USS valuation

UCU has produced a briefing note on the latest USS valuation.

The USS valuation is not a wholly objective process. It is based on a set of assumptions and projections in relation to the elements which contribute to the cost of providing pensions over the next 40 years or so.

The USS board will agree its approach to the valuation on 17 November. From discussion with USS officers and the scheme’s actuary, it seems that USS will base its valuation on unnecessarily conservative accounting assumptions about the health of the pension fund. The effect of this is to artificially inflate the size of any problems and make USS look less ‘funded’ than it is. It also creates a retrospective justification for the employers’ reforms, railroaded through the scheme earlier this year.

UCU‘s own actuarial advice indicates that the scheme’s assumptions are ultra-conservative. If they are changed even slightly, the fund looks healthier. Further, this bolsters the case that there is room to enable a negotiated settlement that preserves the attractiveness of the scheme.

The General Secretary has now written to the USS board setting out our challenge to the proposed assumptions underpinning their approach to the valuation.

Read the union’s full briefing note for members here: USS valuation: UCU briefing note

Read the General Secretary’s letter to the USS board here:  General Secretary’s letter

2 comments to USS valuation